Skip to content

All ideas

← Get Help, and give us Suggestions and Feedback

I suggest you ...

You've used all your votes and won't be able to post a new idea, but you can still search and comment on existing ideas.

There are two ways to get more votes:

  • When an admin closes an idea you've voted on, you'll get your votes back from that idea.
  • You can remove your votes from an open idea you support.
  • To see ideas you have already voted on, select the "My feedback" filter and select "My open ideas".
(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

50 results found

  1. When I work on guidelines I would like to add comments in text, just like in Word

    I would like to add comments in any text box, just like I'm used to from word. Comments should be possible to edit, delete and reply to, and it should say who wrote the comment and when.
    It should be possible to see by a glance, where in the guideline there are comments.

    0 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  14 comments  ·  Admin →

  2. I would like to reuse text I have written previously in the guideline, especially for PICO data

    We often use the same phrases for outcomes, outcome descriptions, time frames, Measurements, downgrade/upgrade comments. It would be great to reuse phrases written earlier in the guideline, to get consistent language and speed up the writing.

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  3 comments  ·  Admin →

  3. I want to be able to send a "secret" link to a guideline under development to others, so they can view without having to log in

    The guideline should be accessible for view-only for everyone that has the link, but should not be listed in the public guideline listing. That way it will be "hidden" for all others that do not have the link.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →

  4. Improve the Comments section so I can get a quick overview of all incoming comments, with flagging and comment-functions

    As a guideline /section admin, I would want to get a notice (maybe an email? At least a visual hint in the author platform) when there is a comment being placed by a guideline user. I would want to have the possibility to flag certain comments for follow-up and also comment on them.
    I would want to be able to go one place and see all incomming comments for a guideline or guideline section, not having to go into each and every recommendation.
    That would be great for peer review and public review, but also for continous improvements.
    "reported by…

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  41 comments  ·  Admin →

  5. Allowing guideline admins to decide layout of the pdf exported

    10 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  2 comments  ·  Admin →

  6. Enable Signing up/subscribing to the application as an institution

    2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →

  7. Improve the design of the evidence profile

    Make it more alike the interactive summary of findings work done in DECIDE

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  1 comment  ·  Admin →

  8. Add possibilities for admin personnel to pull out statistics from usage patterns of the guideline.

    Suggestions for statistics to show:
    How many readers do the guideline have each week
    Which recommendations are opened to view details, and how often

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →

  9. Add functionality for each author to state her/his conflicts of interest, generally and by each PICO/ recommendation

    2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →

  10. Better functionality to do the quality assessment /Grading in a transparent way

    0 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →

  11. Allow editing of reference format.

    Allow minor edits to punctuation and formatting of references for a more seamless display in published guidelines.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →

  12. I would want to add text blocks for Cost-effectiveness, Equity, Acceptability and Feasibility (from EtD framework) in Key info

    Currently there are only 4 factors in the key info section, and Cost-effectiveness, Equity, Acceptability and Feasibility is pooled in with Resources. In some cases it would be good to write a separate text block for Cost-effectiveness, Equity, Acceptability and Feasibility.
    It should be optional.

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →

  13. Add a field/s in the evidence profile so it is clear which paper the data extraction relates to

    The evidence summary may contain multiple papers requiring these references to be ticked so they are in the PDF output. This means it is not always obvious which paper has been used for the data extraction. It would be helpful to have a field or multiple fields in the evidence profile so we can see a ta glance which paper the data is from.

    0 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →

  14. Full Word export of the guideline

    Many users have asked for a full word export of the guideline

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →

  15. Page numbers in table of contents in the PDF

    Now the table of contents in the PDF have clickable links, but not page numbers. It would be increase usability to have page numbers also

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →

  16. Having track changes stay on as default

    It would be useful if I could activate tracked changes and when I saved and closed the text box, the tracked changes function stays turned on - just like in MS Word. Otherwise it is reliant on working group members remembering to turn tracked changes on every time they make a change.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Admin →

  17. Make it possible to set a Strong and Weak AGAINST label (not just strong and weak)

    Now you can set Strong and Weak recommendations, but I also want to set Strong and Weak AGAINST, and making it visually easy to spot the against-recommendations

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →

  18. allow to enter free text in the Evidence profiles

    Sometimes it is inappropriate to do a meta-analysis, and then you end up with separate study results, or ranges of results. Now, it's not possible to add this kind of information.

    5 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  1 comment  ·  Admin →

  19. Allow all settings to be saved across to the copy of the guideline

    Currently milestones and notes within the checklist are not saved across to the guideline copy which means having to re-enter all of that information

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Admin →

  20. begrunner endring av Wells score

    Jeg ser at Wells score i VTE guidelines er endret fra 10 til 11 kriterier. I orginal scoren står sengeleie mer enn 3 dager ELLER kirurgi i en boks, hos MAGIC guidelines er dette delt opp i to. Dette medfører at en pasient som nylig ble operert og fikk en postop infeksjon med forlenget sengeleie kan få to poeng i stenden for ett. I følge litteraturen har pas med to poeng moderat risiko rundt 17%, mens de med høy risiko med tre eller flere poeng har et 75% pretest sannsynlighet. Spørsmålet mitt er om denne endring av Wells score er…

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  1 comment  ·  Admin →
← Previous 1 3
  • Don't see your idea?

All ideas

Categories

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)