All ideas
-
31 votes
The viewing part is partly done. Try to view your guidelines on your smartphone.
-
Add Internal links in the guideline
(internal) links between sections would be very usefull. For example when refering to the same table in different sections.
It would be great if this feature has the option for
1) linking to another section
2) showing extra information in a pop-up screen (for example for medical definitions used)18 votes -
Make it possible to make a multiple-comparisons table
This will just be a view of existing information. It can be used to compare the different options when one has multiple PICO questions with different comparisons, but same P's and O's.
We want to place them in one comparison-table so it is easier for the end users (and authors) to compare the alternatives.15 votesWe have made the first prototype of this, and will be working on implementation during the next months.
-
9 votes
You can upload your own cover page for the PDF. Other layout decision will follow.
-
Being able to add Diagnostic PICOs
This should probably done after the DECIDE framework has worked through how these PICOs should be written
7 votes -
Gjøre Retningslinjene for antikoagulasjon lettere å finne.
Retningslinjene for antikoagulasjon er utrolig vanskelig å finne ved søk på nett! Måtte gå via en link i en tweet....
5 votes -
4 votes
-
I would want to add text blocks for Cost-effectiveness, Equity, Acceptability and Feasibility (from EtD framework) in Key info
Currently there are only 4 factors in the key info section, and Cost-effectiveness, Equity, Acceptability and Feasibility is pooled in with Resources. In some cases it would be good to write a separate text block for Cost-effectiveness, Equity, Acceptability and Feasibility.
It should be optional.4 votes -
Merging PICOs
When importing PICOs from RevMan or reviewing the PICOs made by others, it is sometimes easier to organize the PICOs in a different way. For instance, Cochrane often organises their PICOs on types of outcomes (1 PICO for effectiveness, 1 PICO for adverse effects). However, in MAGIC it may be easier to view both the positive and negative outcomes in the same PICO. Therefore it would be nice to be able to move an outcome to another PICO or to simply merge 2 PICOs into the same.
4 votes -
Inline explanation of strong/weak recommendation does not account for whether recommendation is for or against
An item that has the tags [STRONG RECOMMENDATION] [AGAINST] still has the inline explanation "Benefits outweigh harms for almost everyone. All or nearly all informed patients would likely want this option."
4 votes -
I would like to reuse text I have written previously in the guideline, especially for PICO data
We often use the same phrases for outcomes, outcome descriptions, time frames, Measurements, downgrade/upgrade comments. It would be great to reuse phrases written earlier in the guideline, to get consistent language and speed up the writing.
4 votes -
Include Background when exporting PICO's or Recs
Currently you can export the Background information when you export a PDF (entire guideline). it would be good to be able to select include Background when exporting Recs or PICO's.
3 votes -
3 votes
-
Improve the user-settings page
a) Picture and contact detalis
b) Affiliation3 votes -
3 votes
-
2 votes
-
2 votes
-
Linking the checklist with the data uploaded ( vise-versa) to move forward.
Prompting the admins to follow the steps in preparing the documents to ensure the quality.
1 vote -
1 vote
-
Improve the Comments section so I can get a quick overview of all incoming comments, with flagging and comment-functions
As a guideline /section admin, I would want to get a notice (maybe an email? At least a visual hint in the author platform) when there is a comment being placed by a guideline user. I would want to have the possibility to flag certain comments for follow-up and also comment on them.
I would want to be able to go one place and see all incomming comments for a guideline or guideline section, not having to go into each and every recommendation.
That would be great for peer review and public review, but also for continous improvements.
"reported by…1 vote
- Don't see your idea?