This should probably done after the DECIDE framework has worked through how these PICOs should be written

When importing PICOs from RevMan or reviewing the PICOs made by others, it is sometimes easier to organize the PICOs in a different way. For instance, Cochrane often organises their PICOs on types of outcomes (1 PICO for effectiveness, 1 PICO for adverse effects). However, in MAGIC it may be easier to view both the positive and negative outcomes in the same PICO. Therefore it would be nice to be able to move an outcome to another PICO or to simply merge 2 PICOs into the same.

Prompting the admins to follow the steps in preparing the documents to ensure the quality.

Currently there are only 4 factors in the key info section, and Cost-effectiveness, Equity, Acceptability and Feasibility is pooled in with Resources. In some cases it would be good to write a separate text block for Cost-effectiveness, Equity, Acceptability and Feasibility.
It should be optional.

This would be great for adaptation, and for sharing evidence between guideline organizations.

Suggestions for statistics to show:
How many readers do the guideline have each week
Which recommendations are opened to view details, and how often

It would feel good to be able to download a full copy of my guideline, that could be used to restore it should something go terribly wrong.

Now you can only give someone permissions on a guideline-by-guideline level, but for larger guidelines you would want to have this down to the section levels

We often use the same phrases for outcomes, outcome descriptions, time frames, Measurements, downgrade/upgrade comments. It would be great to reuse phrases written earlier in the guideline, to get consistent language and speed up the writing.