All ideas

I suggest you ...

You've used all your votes and won't be able to post a new idea, but you can still search and comment on existing ideas.

There are two ways to get more votes:

  • When an admin closes an idea you've voted on, you'll get your votes back from that idea.
  • You can remove your votes from an open idea you support.
  • To see ideas you have already voted on, select the "My feedback" filter and select "My open ideas".
(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  1. I would like to reuse text I have written previously in the guideline, especially for PICO data

    We often use the same phrases for outcomes, outcome descriptions, time frames, Measurements, downgrade/upgrade comments. It would be great to reuse phrases written earlier in the guideline, to get consistent language and speed up the writing.

    4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  3 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  2. I want to be able to send a "secret" link to a guideline under development to others, so they can view without having to log in

    The guideline should be accessible for view-only for everyone that has the link, but should not be listed in the public guideline listing. That way it will be "hidden" for all others that do not have the link.

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. Add Internal links in the guideline

    (internal) links between sections would be very usefull. For example when refering to the same table in different sections.
    It would be great if this feature has the option for
    1) linking to another section
    2) showing extra information in a pop-up screen (for example for medical definitions used)

    20 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  3 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  4. Make it possible to make a multiple-comparisons table

    This will just be a view of existing information. It can be used to compare the different options when one has multiple PICO questions with different comparisons, but same P's and O's.
    We want to place them in one comparison-table so it is easier for the end users (and authors) to compare the alternatives.

    15 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  5. Improve the user-settings page

    a) Picture and contact detalis
    b) Affiliation

    3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  6. Being able to add Diagnostic PICOs

    This should probably done after the DECIDE framework has worked through how these PICOs should be written

    10 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  7. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  8. Allow editing of reference format.

    Allow minor edits to punctuation and formatting of references for a more seamless display in published guidelines.

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  9. Inline explanation of strong/weak recommendation does not account for whether recommendation is for or against

    An item that has the tags [STRONG RECOMMENDATION] [AGAINST] still has the inline explanation "Benefits outweigh harms for almost everyone. All or nearly all informed patients would likely want this option."

    4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  10. I would want to add text blocks for Cost-effectiveness, Equity, Acceptability and Feasibility (from EtD framework) in Key info

    Currently there are only 4 factors in the key info section, and Cost-effectiveness, Equity, Acceptability and Feasibility is pooled in with Resources. In some cases it would be good to write a separate text block for Cost-effectiveness, Equity, Acceptability and Feasibility.
    It should be optional.

    4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  11. Merging PICOs

    When importing PICOs from RevMan or reviewing the PICOs made by others, it is sometimes easier to organize the PICOs in a different way. For instance, Cochrane often organises their PICOs on types of outcomes (1 PICO for effectiveness, 1 PICO for adverse effects). However, in MAGIC it may be easier to view both the positive and negative outcomes in the same PICO. Therefore it would be nice to be able to move an outcome to another PICO or to simply merge 2 PICOs into the same.

    4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  12. Include Background when exporting PICO's or Recs

    Currently you can export the Background information when you export a PDF (entire guideline). it would be good to be able to select include Background when exporting Recs or PICO's.

    3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  13. Linking the checklist with the data uploaded ( vise-versa) to move forward.

    Prompting the admins to follow the steps in preparing the documents to ensure the quality.

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  14. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  15. Gjøre Retningslinjene for antikoagulasjon lettere å finne.

    Retningslinjene for antikoagulasjon er utrolig vanskelig å finne ved søk på nett! Måtte gå via en link i en tweet....

    5 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  16. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  17. Improve the Comments section so I can get a quick overview of all incoming comments, with flagging and comment-functions

    As a guideline /section admin, I would want to get a notice (maybe an email? At least a visual hint in the author platform) when there is a comment being placed by a guideline user. I would want to have the possibility to flag certain comments for follow-up and also comment on them.
    I would want to be able to go one place and see all incomming comments for a guideline or guideline section, not having to go into each and every recommendation.
    That would be great for peer review and public review, but also for continous improvements.
    "reported by…

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  18. 31 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  19. 9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  20. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
← Previous 1
  • Don't see your idea?

All ideas

Feedback and Knowledge Base