• Be able to bulk edit potential conflicts related to one intervention (e.g. Low for all panel members), or for one panel member (e.g. Low for all interventions for that member)
• Show only one instance of re-occuring interventions. Sometimes an intervention is mentioned in multiple PICOs, and thus they appear multiple times in the list of interventions. We will collapse multiple instances so it only shows one time.

Voting and Delphi process facilitator

• Open ended question. Can be used in scoping, to get feedback on ideas, or feedback on phrasing in a recommendation or text block. Participants write their answer in free text.
• Multiple choice question. Can be used where you give panel members options to choose from, e.g "Should this intervention be included": "Yes, No, Uncertain". Participants vote and can also give a comment in free text.
• Recommendation Strength (per intervention). In recommendation you can run polls for strength and direction, related to each intervention in question. The poll administrator can include voting related to one or more intervention in the same poll.
• Direction of effect (per outcome in a PICO). In PICOs you can run polls for direction of effect related to each outcome in question. The poll administrator can include voting related to one or more outcomes in the same poll. You can also use the comment feature to get opinions of magnitude of effect, or use a separate multiple choice poll for that. 

• Judgements in evidence to decision factors. In recommendations you can run polls for judgements per evidence to decision factor. The poll administrator can include voting related to one or more factor in the same poll. This will be made to work with both  pairwise and multiple intervention comparisons.
• Size of effect (per outcome in a PICO). In PICOs you can run polls for size of effect related to each outcome in question. The poll administrator can include voting related to one or more outcomes in the same poll. 

• Only admins can start and end polls. Polls can be duplicated and rerunned. 
• Admins can add any person with permissions to the guideline, as participant in a poll. You can use the group feature (described below), to easier add everyone belonging to a specific panel or guideline group. 
• If there are potential conflicts of interests registered on a participant, it will be shown to the admin. 
• Admins do not see who voted what, but see who hasn't voted, and can send a nudge email to the remaining participants
• Panel members could be given access to see the poll results
• Admins can write a conclusion of the vote
• When polls are started, all participants gets an email with instructions and links
• Admins have access to the full history of polls for each recommendation, PICO and guideline, across guideline versions. 

• Admin can filter results to see only participants without any potential conflicts
  

Make groups for guideline members

• Admins make the group labels
• Admin can assign any guideline member to one or more groups.
• Permission level (admin, author, reviewer, viewer) are standard groups that are added to all places where there are group filters 

• Choose to include the Evidence profiles in an Annex instead of in the text
• Choose to not include the evidence profiles in the PDF
• Choose to include footnotes for the Evidence profiles

• Only in research settings
  
• Implications for research
  

• Possibly outdated
  
• Updated evidence, no change in recommendation
  
• Reviewed, no new evidence

• Admins can turn off showing banner for explanatory text related to the recommendation strength
• Widgets now show with practical information open, if chosen in the widget specification.

• Implementation of a FHIR API
• Improved Desktop and Mobile app
• Diagnostic PICOs
• Decision aids widgets
• Better internal linking